Home | Volume 14 | Article number 25

Research

Assessment of farm size, gender dynamics, and biosecurity practices in the incidence of Newcastle disease and avian influenza in indigenous chicken and Guinea fowl smallholder farms in Northern Benin

Assessment of farm size, gender dynamics, and biosecurity practices in the incidence of Newcastle disease and avian influenza in indigenous chicken and Guinea fowl smallholder farms in Northern Benin

Edmond Onidje1,&, Vitus Burimuah2, Oluwole Oyetunde Oni3, Benjamin Obukowho Emikpe2

 

1Pan African University Life and Earth Sciences Institute (including Health and Agriculture), Ibadan, Nigeria, 2School of Veterinary Medicine, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, 3School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom

 

 

&Corresponding author
Edmond Onidje, Pan African University Life and Earth Sciences Institute (including Health and Agriculture), Ibadan, Nigeria

 

 

Abstract

Introduction: in the northern region of Benin, poultry farming is essential for livelihood and food security but is challenged by Newcastle Disease (ND) and Avian Influenza (AI). This study explores how gender dynamics and biosecurity practices affect the prevalence of these diseases in local poultry farms.

 

Methods: a survey was conducted among 118 smallholder farmers (52 men and 66 women) to gather data on biosecurity practices, disease incidence, and farm demographics. The data were analyzed to identify relationships between variables such as gender, farm size, and biosecurity measures.

 

Results: women predominantly managed small-scale farms (60.10%). Newcastle disease was reported by 49.15% of farmers, with symptoms including torticollis (43.10%) and greenish diarrhea (37.93%). Avian influenza was reported by 30.76% of farmers, with symptoms such as hemorrhagic comb wattles and legs (34.29%) and sudden death (25.71%). Vaccination against ND was practiced by 51.69% of farmers; none were vaccinated against AI. Significant relationships were found between gender and farm size (p < 0.001), biosecurity implementation and ND experience (p = 0.027), wild bird contact and AI experience (p < 0.001), and quarantine practice and AI experience (p = 0.006).

 

Conclusion: the study underscores the necessity for enhanced biosecurity measures and veterinary services to control Newcastle disease and Avian influenza in Northern Benin. It emphasizes the importance of empowering female farmers through improved access to biosecurity resources, targeted training, and microfinancing. Experience with ND motivates preventive actions, whereas AI experience did not significantly impact biosecurity practices.

 

 

Introduction    Down

Poultry farming is a crucial element of the agricultural economy in many developing regions, including the Republic of Benin, where it stands as the second most important livestock sector after cattle [1,2]. It plays a significant role in providing livelihoods and nutrition for rural communities. For millions of small-scale producers, many of whom face financial hardships, poultry farming meets essential domestic and economic needs. The sale of poultry offers these rural households a vital source of cash income [1].

In Benin, the poultry sector is dominated by indigenous species, with Guinea fowl being the third most prevalent domestic bird after ducks and chickens [3]. Recent data from Benin's Agricultural Statistics Department (DSA) indicate that the country's poultry flock has grown substantially, with the indigenous chicken population reaching approximately 16.431 million heads in 2023, a 7.50% increase from the previous year's count [4]. This growth underscores the sector's importance in sustaining the livelihoods of many Beninese, particularly in rural areas.

Despite this growth, the indigenous poultry industry in Benin faces several challenges, including low productivity, poor biosecurity, and a lack of inputs. These issues are more pronounced among traditional smallholders who dominate domestic production [5]. Indigenous poultry farms are particularly vulnerable to diseases such as Newcastle disease (ND) and Avian influenza (AI), which pose significant risks to poultry health, public health, and the economic stability of the region [6]. Newcastle disease and AI are highly contagious viral diseases that can lead to severe morbidity and mortality in poultry populations flocks [7]. Effective control and prevention of these diseases rely heavily on stringent biosecurity measures, such as regulating farm hygiene, controlling access to poultry facilities, and managing farm inputs and outputs [8].

In Northern Benin, the traditional and extensive nature of indigenous poultry farming presents unique challenges for disease control. Smallholder farmers often lack the resources and knowledge needed to implement comprehensive biosecurity protocols [9]. Additionally, the scale of poultry farming and gender roles significantly influence management practices and the adoption of biosecurity measures. Women, in particular, play a critical role in poultry farming in this region, often managing small-scale operations that are especially vulnerable to disease outbreaks due to limited resources and access to information [10].

This study aims to assess the association between the poultry farms size and the gender, the current biosecurity practices among indigenous poultry farms in Northern Benin and the occurrence of ND and AI. By identifying gaps in biosecurity, analyzing the influence of farm size, and understanding gender dynamics, this research seeks to provide evidence-based recommendations to enhance disease control and improve the sustainability of poultry farming in the region.

 

 

Methods Up    Down

Description of study sites: this research was conducted in Benin's Northern region specifically in the Atacora and Donga departments. The Northern region of Benin, which is situated above the central part of the country, extends towards the borders with Burkina Faso, Niger, Nigeria, and Togo. Geographically, it lies between latitudes 10° and 12°N and longitudes 1° and 3°E. Administratively, the Northern region of Benin comprises several departments, including Alibori, Atacora, Borgou, and Donga [11]. The Atacora department is situated in the north-western part of Benin, sharing borders with Togo to the west and Burkina Faso to the north (Figure 1). It comprises nine communes: Boukoumbé, Cobly, Kérou, Kouandé, Matéri, Natitingou (the prefecture), and Pehunko, covering an area of 20,499 km2 with approximately 517 villages and town districts. The Donga department, which was previously part of the Atacora department, covers an area of 11,126 km2 and includes the communities of Bassila, Copargo, Djougou (the prefecture), and Ouaké (Figure 1).

Study design: a multistage sampling approach was used to select farmers for the study. Initially, six districts (Bassila, Boukoumbé, Djougou, Kouandé, Natitingou, and Pehunco), known for significant guinea fowl and indigenous chicken populations, were purposefully chosen. Subsequently, farmers were randomly sampled from 118 smallholder farms using a simple random sampling method. This diverse sample included farmers of local chickens and guinea fowl across various age groups and genders, managing both vaccinated and unvaccinated birds, and those with birds appearing healthy or showing symptoms of Newcastle Disease (ND) and Avian Influenza (AI).

Sample size determination and sampling criteria: the number of smallholder farms (n) was determined using the Cochran formula [12].

The formula takes into account the desired level of confidence (Z score at 95% confidence interval), expected proportion (p), and margin of error (e). For this study; confidence level: 95% (Z = 1.96), margin of error (d) = 0.05 (±5%), expected proportion (p) = 0.0838 derived from the average prevalence of Newcastle Disease and Avian Influenza in neighboring regions of Togo [13], Niger [14], and Southern Benin [13] were used to estimate the sample size. The estimated sample size required was 118 smallholder farmers. Simple random sampling was employed to select smallholder farms. This process involved visiting various areas within the study region and randomly selecting smallholder farms on-site, ensuring that each had an equal chance of being included in the sample.

Data collection: the data collection process for this study involved a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative methods. To achieve the objectives of assessing the association between the poultry farms size and the gender, the current biosecurity practices among indigenous poultry farms in Northern Benin and the occurrence of ND and AI, a structured questionnaire was designed and pre-tested. The questionnaire was administered to 118 smallholder farmers in Northern Benin. This questionnaire gathered information on various biosecurity practices, including regular cleaning and disinfection of poultry houses, proper manure management, quarantine and isolation practices, and carcass disposal methods. Additionally, the questionnaire inquired about the farmers' knowledge of Newcastle Disease (ND) and Avian Influenza (AI), as well as their vaccination practices against these diseases. The study also documented the prevalence of ND and AI including outbreaks, morbidity, and mortality rates in the sampled flocks, noting common symptoms observed and any vaccination measures implemented by the farmers.

Data management and analysis: the data were entered into Microsoft ExcelŽ 2019 and analyzed using STATA software. Descriptive statistics were generated and presented in tables. The data were categorized and summarized, with farm size and gender contributions analyzed through quantitative methods. Chi-square tests were performed to assess the association between farm size and gender, biosecurity practices, and the frequency of Newcastle Disease (ND) and Avian Influenza (AI). All statistical tests were conducted at a 5% significance level (95% confidence interval).

 

 

Results Up    Down

Demographic profile of indigenous chicken and guinea fowl farmers in Northern region of Benin: the demographic characteristics of poultry and guinea fowl farmers in the Northern region of Benin are summarized in Table 1. The study sample consisted of 66 females (55.93%) and 52 males (44.07%). The age distribution of the farmers revealed that the majority were aged between 30-50 years (61.86%), followed by those aged 20-30 years (24.58%), over 51 years (11.86%), and under 19 years (1.69%). Regarding education levels, 38.14% of the farmers were illiterate, 44.92% had primary education, and 16.95% had secondary education. Employment status varied, with 47.46% of farmers being unemployed, 14.41% employed, 33.05% self-employed, and 5.08% retired (Table 1).

Demographic representation of indigenous chicken and Guinea fowl farmers in Northern Region of Benin: the Table 2 details the distribution of poultry farms by size and the gender of the farmers. Female farmers predominantly managed small-scale farms (less than 50 birds), accounting for 60.10% compared to 28.85% managed by males. Medium-scale farms (51-200 birds) were managed almost equally by females (34.85%) and males (46.15%). Large-scale farms (more than 200 birds) were primarily managed by males (25.00%), with only 4.55% of such farms managed by females (Table 2).

Biosecurity and management practices of indigenous chicken and guinea fowl farmers in the Northern region of Benin: the Table 3 details biosecurity and management practices among farmers. It shows that only 43.22% implement biosecurity measures. Cleaning frequency varies, with 38.14% cleaning as needed, 24.58% monthly, every two weeks 23.73%, and other frequencies less common. Manure management practices include spreading on fields (39.83%), selling (33.90%), throwing away (24.58%), and composting (1.69%). Quarantine practices are followed by 59.09%, while isolation of sick birds is practiced by 46.15%. Carcass disposal methods include open disposal (39.83%), burial (27.12%), giving to dogs (20.34%), eating (11.86%), and incineration (0.85%). Contact with wild birds is reported by 30.51% of farmers.

Knowledge and occurrence of Newcastle disease and Avian influenza in indigenous chicken and guinea fowl farms in the Northern region of Benin: Knowledge and incidence of Newcastle disease (NDV) among the farmers are reported in Table 4. Nearly half (49.15%) of the farmers had experienced NDV in their flocks. The common symptoms recognized included torticollis (43.10%), greenish diarrhea (37.93%), respiratory distress and difficulty breathing (15.52%), and a drop in egg production (3.45%). Vaccination against NDV was practiced by 51.69% of the farmers. Additionally, only 30.76% of the farmers reported having encountered AI in their farms. The common symptoms identified included haemorrhagic comb, wattles, and legs (34.29%), sudden death (25.71%), coughing and sneezing (17.14%), diarrhea (17.14%), and respiratory distress and difficulty breathing (5.71%). Notably, none of the farmers reported vaccinating against AI (Table 4). The associations between various farm practices and farmer experiences were examined using Pearson's Chi-square tests (Table 5). The analysis demonstrated significant relationships between several variables: gender and farm size (χ2 = 16.2020, p < 0.001), gender and cleaning (χ2 = 16.2020, p = 0.034), biosecurity implementation and NDV experience (χ2 = 4.8624, p = 0.027), wild bird contact and AI experience (χ2 = 67.4475, p < 0.001), and quarantine practice and AI experience (χ2 = 7.6765, p = 0.006). Conversely, no significant associations were found between biosecurity implementation and AI experience (χ2 = 0.0154, p = 0.901), wild bird contact and NDV experience (χ2 = 0.8498, p = 0.357), outside bird purchase and NDV experience (χ2 = 2.6975, p = 0.101), or outside bird purchase and AI experience (χ2 = 0.1784, p = 0.673).

 

 

Discussion Up    Down

The demographic profile of indigenous chicken and guinea fowl farmers in Northern Benin exhibits a higher proportion of female farmers (55.93%) compared to their male counterparts (44.07%). This finding aligns with similar studies conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, where women often dominate small-scale poultry farming due to its relatively low capital requirement and suitability for household-level operations [15,16]. However, a study by Dankwa et al. [17] in Northern Ghana revealed a contrasting trend, with farmers being predominantly male (83.3%). These regional variations in gender roles and participation in poultry farming across sub-Saharan Africa highlight the influence of cultural, economic, and social factors on the dynamics of small-scale poultry production.

The age distribution of the farmers in this study indicates that a significant majority of farmers, 61.86%, fall within the 30 to 50-year age bracket. This suggests a workforce characterized by maturity and experience, potentially enhancing their resilience and adaptability to farming challenges. This finding aligns with Moffo et al. [18], who reported that 70.1% of farmers were within the same age range, reinforcing the observation of a predominantly middle-aged farming population. In the current study, 38.14% of the farmers were identified as illiterate, which presents a substantial barrier to the implementation of biosecurity measures. Similar trends have been documented in other countries; for instance, studies by Ogunlade and Adebayo and Lawal et al. [19,20], in Nigeria revealed that a significant portion of the farming population, particularly women, lacked formal education, with illiteracy rates reaching as high as 88.3%.

The analysis of farm size distribution by gender reveals significant (χ2 = 16.2020, P<0.001) disparities: female farmers predominantly manage small-scale operations with less than 50 birds, whereas male farmers are more commonly associated with medium-scale (51-200 birds) and large-scale farms (over 200 birds). This gender-based disparity in farm sizes is likely attributable to differential access to critical resources such as land and capital. Men generally have greater access to these resources, which facilitates their involvement in larger-scale farming operations. These findings are consistent with previous research by Abdirahman et al. [21], which highlights that men typically have better access to land, capital, and other essential resources required for expanding farm operations.

The study also revealed significant gaps in biosecurity among poultry farmers in Northern Benin, with only 43.22% following recommended biosecurity practices. Cleaning and disinfection are inconsistent: every two weeks (23.73%), monthly (24.58%), and as needed (38.14%). Manure management is also insufficient, with 39.83% spreading it on fields and 33.90% selling it. Disposal methods include open disposal (39.83%), burial (27.12%), giving to dogs (20.34%), consumption (11.86%), and incineration (0.85%), highlighting a lack of awareness or resources for proper disposal. Similar challenges in biosecurity practices were reported by Abdurrahman et al. [22] in Nigeria, where only 12% of poultry farms adhered to recommended biosecurity measures. The inadequate quarantine practices (59.09%) and isolation of sick birds (46.15%) further underscore the need for improved training and resources. Effective biosecurity measures are crucial for preventing disease outbreaks, as evidenced by Otieno et al. [23]. The prevalence of Newcastle Disease (ND) among the farmers' flocks was relatively high, with 49.15% of farmers reporting experiencing ND. Common symptoms recognized included torticollis (43.10%) and greenish diarrhea (37.93%). Vaccination against ND was practiced by 51.69% of the farmers, indicating moderate preventive measures. This is comparable to findings by Campbell et al. [24] in Tanzania, where 57% of poultry farmers practiced vaccination. Similarly, research by Otiang et al. [25] in Kenya and Ouma et al. [26] in Northern Ghana, and Central Tanzania, respectively, identified ND as a major concern on poultry farms, with significant efforts directed towards vaccination.

In contrast, the occurrence of Avian influenza (AI) was reported by only 30.76% of farmers, with symptoms such as hemorrhagic combs and sudden death being the most common. None of the farmers reported vaccinating against AI, reflecting a significant gap in preventive measures. Fatiregun and Saani [27], highlighted similar issues in Nigeria, where vaccination rates remained low due to cost and lack of access to vaccines.

This study examines the associations between biosecurity measures, disease experiences (NDV and AI), wild bird contact, gender, and farm size among farmers, using Pearson's Chi-Square tests. Significant differences in cleaning frequency were found (χ2 = 12.0574, p = 0.034), with females cleaning more regularly than males, aligning with Waithanji et al. [28]. No significant gender differences in biosecurity adoption were found, consistent with Mensah-Bonsu et al. [29]. Farmers with NDV experience were more likely to implement biosecurity measures (χ2 = 4.8624, p = 0.027), as seen in Nigeria and Ghana [30,31]. Avian influenza experience did not significantly influence biosecurity practices (χ2 = 0.8417, p = 0.656), unlike in Egypt [32], likely due to regional differences. The link between AI experience and wild bird contact (χ2 = 67.5817, p < 0.001) highlights wild birds' role in HPAI transmission, aligning with Kalonda et al. [33] and emphasizing the need for collaboration along avian migration routes [34]. These findings underscore the importance of tailored biosecurity education and intervention programs.

Limitations of the study: the study relied on self-reported data, which may introduce biases and inaccuracies, potentially affecting the reliability of the data on biosecurity practices, disease experiences, and farm sizes. Furthermore, the study did not explore the socio-economic factors that influence farming practices in detail, which could have provided valuable insights into the dynamics of poultry farming and disease transmission.

 

 

Conclusion Up    Down

This study underscores the urgent need for improved biosecurity and disease management among indigenous chicken and guinea fowl farmers in Northern Benin. Farmers with prior experience of Newcastle disease are more likely to adopt biosecurity measures, while Avian Influenza experience has less impact, likely due to regional differences in disease prevalence. Gender disparities were found, with female farmers managing smaller farms highlighting the need for targeted support like training, microfinancing, and cooperatives. The relationship between AI experience and wild bird contact emphasizes the importance of managing these interactions to prevent AI transmission, calling for vigilance and collaboration along avian migration routes. The study recommends accessible biosecurity training, especially for illiterate and female farmers, as well as strengthening veterinary services, regular health checks, timely vaccinations, and effective outbreak responses. Collaboration between governmental and non-governmental organizations is essential for these measures. Future research should focus on monitoring the impact of interventions and exploring socio-economic factors affecting farming practices to improve poultry health, productivity, and farmer livelihoods in Northern Benin.

What is known about this topic

  • Gender disparities: women in rural areas often dominate small-scale poultry farming, managing smaller operations with fewer resources compared to men who typically handle larger-scale farms;
  • Disease vulnerability: traditional poultry farms, especially those managed by women, are particularly vulnerable to diseases such as Newcastle Disease (ND) and Avian Influenza (AI) due to limited access to biosecurity resources and knowledge;
  • Biosecurity practices: the implementation of biosecurity measures is crucial for disease prevention, yet many smallholder farms, particularly those managed by women, often lack proper biosecurity practices.

What this study adds

  • Gender-specific findings: the study highlights significant gender disparities in farm size and biosecurity practices, with female farmers managing predominantly small-scale farms;
  • Disease incidence and practices: there is a significant relationship between biosecurity implementation and ND incidence, indicating that farms with prior ND outbreaks are more likely to adopt biosecurity measures; however, AI experience does not significantly influence biosecurity practices;
  • Recommendations for improvement: the study suggests targeted training programs, microfinancing, and cooperative support for female farmers to enhance their capacity to implement effective biosecurity measures, alongside strengthening veterinary services and vaccination campaigns.

 

 

Competing interests Up    Down

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Authors' contributions Up    Down

Edmond Onidje, Vitus Burimuah, Oluwole Oyetunde Oni, and Benjamin Obukowho Emikpe participated in the development of the research concept. Edmond Onidje gathered data, conducted data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. All authors have thoroughly reviewed and consented to the final iteration of this article, and have made equal contributions to its substance.

 

 

Acknowledgments Up    Down

This research publication is part of the MSc thesis of the first author. Funding for the research is provided by the African Union through the Pan African University Life and Earth Sciences Institute (including health and agriculture), PAULESI.

 

 

Tables and figure Up    Down

Table 1: demographic representation of indigenous poultry and Guinea fowl farmers in Northen Region of Benin

Table 2: distribution of poultry farm size with gender

Table 3: biosecurity and management practices of poultry and guinea fowl farmers in the Northern Region of Benin

Table 4: knowledge and occurrence of Newcastle disease and avian influenza in poultry and guinea fowl farms in northern region of Benin

Table 5: the associations between various farm biosecurity practices and diseases frequency

Figure 1: map of the study area

 

 

References Up    Down

  1. Toko RC. Caractérisation phénotypique et gestion de la population de poulets locaux dans les communes de Dassa et de Toffo au Bénin. 2008. Google Scholar

  2. Hailemichael A, Gebremedhin B, Tegegne A. Status and drivers of village poultry production and its efficiency in Ethiopia. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 2017 Dec 1;83:30-8. Google Scholar

  3. Houndonougbo PV, Bindelle J. Characteristics of Guinea Fowl Breeding in West Africa: A Review. Tropicultura. 2017 Oct 1;35(4). Google Scholar

  4. MAEP. Les chiffres definitifs de la campagne agricole 2023-2024 direction de la statistique agricole (dsa), maep. Cotonou, Bénin. Mars 2024.. Accessed on May 24, 2024.

  5. Ouedraogo B, Bale B, Zoundi S, Sawadogo L. Caractéristiques de l´aviculture villageoise et influence des techniques d´amélioration sur ses performances zootechniques dans la province du Sourou, région Nord-Ouest Burkinabè. Int J Biol Chem Sci. 2015;9(3):1528. Google Scholar

  6. Serrão E, Meers J, Pym R, Copland R, Eagles D, Henning J. Prevalence and incidence of Newcastle disease and prevalence of Avian Influenza infection of scavenging village chickens in Timor-Lesté. Prev Vet Med. 2012;104(3-4):301-308. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Molia S, Grosbois V, Kamissoko B, Sidibe MS, Sissoko KD, Traore I et al. Longitudinal Study of Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease in Village Poultry, Mali, 2009-2011. Avian Dis. 2017;61(2):165-177. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Nurzijah I, Elbohy OA, Kanyuka K, Daly JM, Dunham S. Development of Plant-Based Vaccines for Prevention of Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease in Poultry. Vaccines. 2022;10(3):478. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Boko K, Marc K, Farougou S, Dahouda M, Youssao Abdou Karim I, Aplogan G et al. Farmer perceptions and pathological constraints in helmeted guinea fowl farming in the Borgou department in North-East Benin. Afr J Agric Res. 2011;6. Google Scholar

  10. Ayssiwede SB, Dieng A, Houinato MR, Chrysostome CA, Issay I, Hornick JL et al. Elevage des poulets traditionnels ou indigènes au Sénégal et en Afrique Subsaharienne: état des lieux et contraintes. Ann Médecine Vét. 2013;158. Google Scholar

  11. Sow P, Adaawen SA, Scheffran J. Migration, Social Demands and Environmental Change amongst the Frafra of Northern Ghana and the Biali in Northern Benin. Sustainability. 2014;6(1):375-398. Google Scholar

  12. Bolarinwa O. Sample size estimation for health and social science researchers: The principles and considerations for different study designs. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020;27(2):67. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Langeois Q. Détection et caractérisation de virus respiratoires aviaires en Afrique de l´ouest. 2020. Google Scholar

  14. Moustapha A, Talaki E, Akourki A, Gagara H. Impact and prevalence of Newcastle disease and associated risk factors in village chickens in southern Niger. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research. 2023 May 27;13(3):209-16. Google Scholar

  15. Dessie T, Ogle B. Village Poultry Production Systems in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2001;33(6):521-537. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Adene DF, Oguntade AE. The structure and importance of the commercial and village based poultry industry in Nigeria. Rome FAO. 2006.

  17. Dankwa D, Nelson FS, Mzamo KB, Oddoye EO. A survey of rural poultry management in the West Mamprusi District and the Ga Rural District of Ghana. Ghana journal of agricultural science. 2000;33(1):71-7. Google Scholar

  18. Moffo F, Mouliom Mouiche MM, Kochivi FL, Dongmo JB, Djomgang HK, Tombe P et al. Knowledge, attitudes, practices and risk perception of rural poultry farmers in Cameroon to antimicrobial use and resistance. Prev Vet Med. 2020;182:105087. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Ogunlade I, Adebayo SA. Socio-economic status of women in rural poultry production in selected areas of Kwara State, Nigeria. International Journal of Poultry Science. 2009;8(1):55-9. Google Scholar

  20. Lawal J, Hambali I, Bello A, Wakil Y, Ibrahim A, Salihu I et al. Causes of village chicken (Gallus Gallus Domesticus) losses and level of awareness of Newcastle disease Consequence among village chicken farmers in Bauchi State, North Eastern Nigeria. International Journal of Life Sciences Research. 2015;3(1):251-60. Google Scholar

  21. Abdirahman FA, Wahome RG, Kaluwa C, Oduma J, Nkatha JJ, Adhiambo A et al. Gender barriers and opportunities along the Newcastle disease vaccine value chain in Machakos Town sub-county, Kenya. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 2023 Jan 15;26(1). Google Scholar

  22. Abdurrahman HJ, Bello MB, Bello M, Saheed Y, Muhammad F. Biosecurity Measures and Constraints Among Rural Poultry Farmers in Zamfara State, Nigeria. Anim Vet Sci. 2016;4(4):47-51. Google Scholar

  23. Otieno WA, Nyikal RA, Mbogoh SG, Rao EJO. Adoption of farm biosecurity practices among smallholder poultry farmers in Kenya - An application of latent class analysis with a multinomial logistic regression. Prev Vet Med. 2023 Aug:217:105967. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. Campbell ZA, Marsh TL, Mpolya EA, Thumbi SM, Palmer GH. Newcastle disease vaccine adoption by smallholder households in Tanzania: Identifying determinants and barriers. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(10):e0206058. PubMed | Google Scholar

  25. Otiang E, Thumbi SM, Campbell ZA, Njagi LW, Nyaga PN, Palmer GH. Impact of routine Newcastle disease vaccination on chicken flock size in smallholder farms in western Kenya. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0248596. PubMed | Google Scholar

  26. Ouma EA, Kankya C, Dione M, Kelly T, Enahoro D, Chiwanga G et al. Poultry health constraints in smallholder village poultry systems in Northern Ghana and Central Tanzania. Front Vet Sci. 2023;10:1159331. PubMed | Google Scholar

  27. Fatiregun AA, Saani MM. Knowledge, attitudes and compliance of poultry workers with preventive measures for avian influenza in Lagelu, Oyo State, Nigeria. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008 Apr 1;2(2):130-4. PubMed | Google Scholar

  28. Waithanji E, Affognon DH, King´ori S, Diiro G, Nakimbugwe D, Fiaboe KK. Insects as feed: Gendered knowledge attitudes and practices among poultry and Pond Fish farmers in Kenya. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 2020 Dec 1;92:100312. Google Scholar

  29. Mensah-Bonsu A, Lartey NN, Kuwornu JKM. Gender-segregated analysis of the poultry value chain in Ghana. Gend Technol Dev. 2019;23(2):130-164. Google Scholar

  30. Okpukpara B. Examining the control of bird flu risks among Nigerian poultry producers: implication for effectiveness of biosecurity knowledge, attitude, and practices (EBKAP). Agric Food Econ. 2016;4(1):25. Google Scholar

  31. Adomako K, Ahiabli BY, Hamidu JA, Olympio OS, Yeboah E. Biosecurity Within Poultry Farms in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci. 2024;94(2):351-358. Google Scholar

  32. Hassan Tawfik E. Avian Influenza Practices Among Rural Community in Egypt. Available at SSRN 3582233. 2020 Apr 22. Google Scholar

  33. Kalonda A, Saasa N, Nkhoma P, Kajihara M, Sawa H, Takada A et al. Avian Influenza Viruses Detected in Birds in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. Viruses. 2020;12(9):993. PubMed | Google Scholar

  34. Chen LJ, Lin XD, Tian JH, Liao Y, Ying XH, Shao JW et al. Diversity, evolution and population dynamics of avian influenza viruses circulating in the live poultry markets in China. Virology. 2017;505:33-41. PubMed | Google Scholar